| ||||
To click or not to click...Another mitigating factor in my decision was the time requirements of doing a blended course. If the last quarter decade is any model, I tend to change significant components of my courses every semester. I change projects, add whole new grading categories, etc. on a regular basis. My first semester of teaching the hybrid courses required nearly 50% more of my time than teaching F2F. The second semester that dropped down to around 49.9% more time. I thought I saw a trend there. But I digress! The title of this posting suggested a posting about personal response systems and we haven't gone there yet. I started the semester using our brand new Interwrite PRS systems. My goal was to have at least one question at the beginning, middle and end of each of our ~3 hour classes. I like to track tardies, earlies (when students leave before class is dismissed) and absences. Absences are part of my grading scheme (and 3 tardies/earlies = 1 absence). I'd also read/heard quite a bit about some positive pedagogical impact of using clickers. However, like my experience with hybrid teaching (see, there is a connection!), it requires better planning and forethought than I typically bring to the table. I know I can ask improvisational questions with this system, I just haven't habitized their use yet. I use a couple of nationally-normed pre/post-tests for both content and scientific attitude and I've decided that I'm going to use the PRS system for students to answer the questions and then show the response distributions and talk about the results. I've always used paper-based responses so I've never had the opportunity for immediate feedback. I'll let you know how it goes... | ||||
| Comment | ||||